Nobody in the room ever owned it. The delegates were an audience. Audiences applaud; they don’t carry things home.
the problem into existence
18 → 6 months beforeon purpose, around who is missing
6 → 1 months beforepeople how to take part
Day 1to a bullseye, not a script
Days 1–3without editorializing; synthesize overnight
Every nightownership out, not up
Close → 4 yearsPress → to climb, or tap a step.
“What would make this week wildly successful for you?”
“Rate how relevant each of these pressures is in your context.”
“Force-rank these obstacles based on your discussion as a group.”
“Where is the greatest opportunity for you to address this?”
“What percentage of your effort will you put into each quadrant?”
“What do you intend to change next? And how can we be most helpful?”
“Analysis and ownership read out together.”
The person holding the process isn’t the person holding the subject, and neither of them is the person recording it.
“You are not a facilitator and you are not a participant. Don’t editorialize. Describe.”
Not by lengthening the stage. And each gathering changes the next.
Interaction was a section of the program rather than a thread through it.
The room left aligned on vision but short of named owners.
A live poll or a ninety-second table turn after every input.
No commitment on screen without an action, an owner, a date and a measure.
“A picture is a diagnosis, and people don’t rally to a diagnosis. They rally to something they’ve helped name.”
Traditional facilitation relies on experts speaking to a group; this co-design unlocks the collective wisdom already present.
The tracks will be an invitation to those who do not currently have a seat at the table but should.
Leaders are to glean from the group.
Success won’t be measured by the experience of the days. What people carry out, and what actually happens afterwards, is the real measure.
That you start listening a year out, and let what you hear change the agenda you had in mind.
An agenda the room recognizes as its own before the first session begins.
That you build the streams around who is missing, and fund their seats before you book content.
A room that can actually solve the problem, because the people living it are in it.
That you give up the platform, and publish findings with the disagreements left in.
Credibility that survives contact with the people you are describing.
That you hand the outcomes to owners who are not you.
Work still moving years later, because someone else is carrying it.